🔗 Share this article

Internationally, nations are investing hundreds of billions into what is known as “sovereign AI” – developing domestic artificial intelligence models. From the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are competing to build AI that understands native tongues and local customs.

The International AI Competition

This initiative is a component of a larger global race led by tech giants from the America and China. While firms like a leading AI firm and a social media giant allocate enormous funds, middle powers are additionally making independent bets in the artificial intelligence domain.

However amid such huge amounts at stake, is it possible for less wealthy nations attain notable gains? According to a analyst from a well-known thinktank, “Unless you’re a wealthy nation or a large corporation, it’s a significant burden to build an LLM from nothing.”

Defence Concerns

Numerous nations are hesitant to rely on overseas AI technologies. In India, for example, American-made AI systems have at times fallen short. An illustrative instance featured an AI agent employed to instruct pupils in a distant area – it spoke in the English language with a thick US accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional students.

Furthermore there’s the national security aspect. For the Indian military authorities, employing specific international AI tools is seen as inadmissible. As one entrepreneur commented, “It could have some random learning material that could claim that, for example, a certain region is not part of India … Utilizing that certain model in a military context is a major risk.”

He continued, I’ve discussed with experts who are in security. They wish to use AI, but, disregarding certain models, they are reluctant to rely on American systems because information might go outside the country, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

Domestic Projects

As a result, some nations are funding local ventures. One such effort is underway in India, where a firm is working to build a domestic LLM with state support. This initiative has dedicated approximately a substantial sum to artificial intelligence advancement.

The founder imagines a system that is more compact than leading systems from US and Chinese firms. He notes that India will have to compensate for the funding gap with expertise. “Being in India, we don’t have the luxury of investing massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we contend with such as the enormous investments that the US is pumping in? I think that is where the key skills and the intellectual challenge is essential.”

Regional Emphasis

Across Singapore, a government initiative is supporting AI systems developed in south-east Asia’s local dialects. These particular languages – including Malay, the Thai language, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and more – are often underrepresented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I wish the individuals who are creating these independent AI models were conscious of just how far and the speed at which the cutting edge is moving.

A leader participating in the program says that these systems are intended to enhance bigger models, rather than replacing them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he says, frequently find it challenging to handle native tongues and cultural aspects – communicating in awkward Khmer, for instance, or recommending pork-based dishes to Malaysian users.

Developing regional-language LLMs enables local governments to incorporate local context – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a sophisticated tool developed overseas.

He further explains, I am cautious with the concept independent. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we aim to be more adequately included and we want to grasp the features” of AI systems.

Cross-Border Partnership

For nations trying to carve out a role in an escalating global market, there’s an alternative: team up. Experts connected to a well-known policy school have suggested a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a group of middle-income states.

They call the initiative “Airbus for AI”, modeled after the European successful strategy to build a rival to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. The plan would entail the creation of a public AI company that would pool the assets of various nations’ AI projects – for example the United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a viable alternative to the US and Chinese leaders.

The primary researcher of a paper outlining the concept notes that the proposal has drawn the attention of AI leaders of at least three states so far, as well as multiple national AI companies. Although it is currently centered on “developing countries”, emerging economies – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda included – have likewise indicated willingness.

He elaborates, “Nowadays, I think it’s simply reality there’s reduced confidence in the promises of this current American government. People are asking for example, should we trust any of this tech? Suppose they choose to